Summary Judgment: One of the most powerful tools in a Litigation armoury
A court judgment, given at an early stage, finding for a party without a full trial of the issues and hearing of evidence on the basis that the claim, defence or issue has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason why the matter should be disposed of at trial. Summary judgment may dispose of the case as a whole or be confined to a particular issue.
The procedure for summary judgment is set out in CPR 24.
Summary Judgment is one of the highest civil thresholds and is dealt with by CPR 24.2 which provides as follows:
“The Court may give summary judgment against a claimant or defendant on the whole of a claim or on a particular issue if –
(a) it considers that –
(i) that claimant has no real prospect of succeeding on the claim or issue; or
(ii) that Defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim or issue; and
(b) there is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a trial”.
When considering whether to seek summary judgment, the following principles apply.
- A summary judgment hearing is not the appropriate forum to resolve complex disputes of law or fact – it is only suitable for clear and obvious cases.
- In applying the summary judgment test, the court must consider whether the claimant or defendant has a realistic (as opposed to a fanciful) prospect of success. In this context, ‘realistic’ means ‘with some degree of conviction’ or ‘more than merely arguable’.
- On a summary judgment application, the court must not conduct a ‘mini-trial’ without the benefit of disclosure and cross-examination of evidence, but it must undertake some investigation and analysis of the law and evidence before it, to reach a proper conclusion.
- Where the court is satisfied that it has the necessary law and evidence to reach a conclusion – it should do so. Where a party’s case is wrong in law, the sooner it is stopped, the better.
- Where there is credible contemporaneous material that contradicts a party’s evidence or assertion, a judge may give summary judgment on the basis that the evidence or assertion is not to be believed. However the judge must explain and justify, with reference to the contemporaneous material, that decision.
- The need for further investigation to be carried out can constitute a ‘compelling’ reason for the matter to be heard at trial. Another ‘compelling reason’ might be where legal authority relied upon in a summary judgment hearing is actually the subject of an appeal. Where there are serious allegations, such as to fraud, dishonesty or bad faith, that of itself is not necessarily a ‘compelling’ reason to hold a full trial, but it might be depending on the facts of the particular case.
- CPR Practice Direction 24 clarifies that, on a summary judgment application, the court may:
- give judgment on the claim for either party;
- it may strike out or dismiss the claim;
- it may dismiss the summary judgment application itself;
- or it may make a conditional order.
A conditional order can involve either party making a payment into court or giving security for costs, or it can require a party to take a specific step, failing which that party’s case will be dismissed or struck out. Conditional orders may be made where it is possible but unlikely that a case will succeed and so the CPR 24.2 test is met, but only just.
How Athena Debt Recovery Can Help
- Your debt is treated as if it were money owed to us, and we collect it as quickly as possible.
- We can call on and you can draw on the additional expertise of our Commercial Litigation and Insolvency teams.
- We are approachable, commercial and always happy to discuss individual matters.
- You can rely on our use of the latest technology to ensure an efficient and reliable service.
- We can increase your recoveries by working smarter.
The recovery of debts is extremely important to avoid financial pressure of your business.
We offer a range of services to help you do this and a highly skilled team of commercial debt recovery lawyers who specialise in Pre-Action Collection, Court Proceedings, Enforcement of Judgments, Bankruptcy and Winding Up and Foreign Debt Collection.
We offer a competitive quality debt recovery service for general debt matters.
We also provide a bespoke service for difficult debts or where insolvency proceedings are appropriate.
We can undertake bulk recoveries or debt portfolios.
About the author
Senior litigation executive and manager
Iain is a senior litigation executive and manager of Athena Debt Recovery which is part of the firm’s commercial litigation department supervised by our head of commercial litigation partner Stephen Boyd.
Iain has over 28 years experience in Commercial Debt Recovery having worked in both Private Practice and Industry and has extensive experience working across all industry sectors and has a particular expertise in working with Insolvency Practitioners in advising and recovering outstanding insolvent company ledgers.
Iain brings a pragmatic and commercial approach to recovering debts.
Contact us for a free consultation
If you need any advice or further information regarding this article, please contact us.
We offer a free initial consultation and if clients have a viable claim, we offer a variety of retainer options including no win – no fee arrangements.
Every case or potential case will be assessed, on its own merits.
If you have found this article interesting and would like to learn more about how Athena Law can help you please feel free to contact the writer, Iain Bould, at firstname.lastname@example.org or via the contact page on the website.